Mike Huckabee wants you to know that he's not gonna talk shit about other republican presidential candidates. In fact, just to make sure you know, he's going to make a negative ad, THEN he's going to show EVERYONE the negative ad at a press conference, then not run it because it's negative, so you know he's not about being negative. I like this man's reasoning. Maybe this will work on my girlfriend: "Hey honey, just to show you that I'm not a cheater, I've gone ahead and put the head of my penis inside another woman, just to show you that I could have put it all the way in and started having sex with her, but I chose not to because I'm not a cheater."
He didn't make that ad so that he will not show it, and gain respect points. He made that ad to get back at Romney, but it so happens that he decided to not show it. Your interpretation of Huckabee's reasoning is wrong.
"Your interpretation of Huckabee’s reasoning is wrong."
No it's not. If he had decided not the run a negative campaign, he wouldn't have made the ad in the first place. But he did. And then, AND THEN, he actually had a press where he talked about how he wasn't going to air the ad that NO ONE WOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IF HE JUST DIDN'T AIR IT, and then showed everyone the ad. Yeah, Huckabee is running a "positive campaign." This guy reeks of shmuckism.
Hey, whazzs up with this negative ad stuff? Nothin' wrong with that. He didn't have anything to do with it. Was them other guys. And I mean, like if he did have sompthin' t' do with it, them its gotta be a word-o-some-higher-power thing, right? So whatz-a-mattah-uh?
(4 Comments)
Twitter
Holy Taco Goes to the Bahamas
January 1st, 2008 at 06:47 am
u rock. that is all.
January 1st, 2008 at 10:37 am
He didn't make that ad so that he will not show it, and gain respect points. He made that ad to get back at Romney, but it so happens that he decided to not show it. Your interpretation of Huckabee's reasoning is wrong.
January 1st, 2008 at 04:56 pm
"Your interpretation of Huckabee’s reasoning is wrong."
No it's not. If he had decided not the run a negative campaign, he wouldn't have made the ad in the first place. But he did. And then, AND THEN, he actually had a press where he talked about how he wasn't going to air the ad that NO ONE WOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IF HE JUST DIDN'T AIR IT, and then showed everyone the ad. Yeah, Huckabee is running a "positive campaign." This guy reeks of shmuckism.
January 3rd, 2008 at 02:10 am
Hey, whazzs up with this negative ad stuff? Nothin' wrong with that. He didn't have anything to do with it. Was them other guys. And I mean, like if he did have sompthin' t' do with it, them its gotta be a word-o-some-higher-power thing, right? So whatz-a-mattah-uh?
Post new comment