If you think Al Gore invented the internet so people could share information, you are sadly, sadly mistaken. Read the comments section of most sites and you'll see that the internet was made so people could say really dumb shit without facing the repercussions of saying the same things in person. Thanks to the guys at Panda Smash for helping out with this.
Click on each one to make it bigger.
8. break.com
7. Engadget.com
6. Huffingtonpost.com
5. westborobaptistchurch.com
4. Friendster.com
3. Foxnews.com
2. Holytaco.com
1. Espn.com
Here's some other stories that might piss you off:
I've got a new one for Holy Taco. Get a goddamn professional graphic artist. Christ on a cracker, it was like reading from a MS Paint print out on a dot matrix printer.
I’ve got a new one for Holy Taco. People who complain about a website's semi-decent graphics are HOMOS. Christ on a cracker<--- (wtf? not funny), it was like reading from a MS Paint print out on a dot matrix printer <----(wtf? gay ANALogy)
This post was right on, showing the general hate and anti-everything attitude the internet masks. Think about it, the internet is a place to say shit you wouldn't say in real life. For example, in real life I would have said something like "ahaha, real funny". But that would look retarded as a text comment, so I wrote this lengthy review instead. Also, FUCK YOU!
.retnirp xirtam tod a no tuo tnirp tniaP SM a morf gnidaer ekil saw ti ,rekcarc a no tsirhC .tsitra cihparg lanoisseforp nmaddog a teG .ocaT yloH rof eno wen a tog ev’I
(ygoLANA yag ?ftw)-—< retnirp xirtam tod a no tuo tnirp tniaP SM a morf gnidaer ekil saw ti ,(ynnuf ton ?ftw) —<rekcarc a no tsirhC .SOMOH era scihparg tneced-imes s’etisbew a tuoba nialpmoc ohw elpoeP .ocaT yloH rof eno wen a tog ev’I
Not Funny, like not even close. I wanted to laugh but I couldn't! My shit just took a shit that was funnier than this. You misspelled every word in this post; blind retards could write better than you.. this is a shitty site.. I'm off to friendster
If there was YouTube on here, it would be 95% "In 1937 a girl died from a rotting eyeball. Send this to 500 people or she will douse your anus in turpentine tomorrow" type comments.
The other 5% are the usual "Hey I remember you from last weekend's party, add me!! *www.slutznshit.com*" comments.
July 1st, 2008 at 08:36 pm
You could have done MySpace as well.
July 1st, 2008 at 09:51 pm
I've got a new one for Holy Taco. Get a goddamn professional graphic artist. Christ on a cracker, it was like reading from a MS Paint print out on a dot matrix printer.
July 1st, 2008 at 10:03 pm
I think I saw this attractive girl on "tallmingle.com".
July 1st, 2008 at 10:06 pm
I’ve got a new one for Holy Taco. People who complain about a website's semi-decent graphics are HOMOS. Christ on a cracker<--- (wtf? not funny), it was like reading from a MS Paint print out on a dot matrix printer <----(wtf? gay ANALogy)
July 1st, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Ugly Chops, god dammit I wish i could argue with you but I can not.
July 1st, 2008 at 11:07 pm
Wow dude that is some breakdown you got there. MAkes perfect sense too.
JT
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
July 1st, 2008 at 11:14 pm
This post was right on, showing the general hate and anti-everything attitude the internet masks. Think about it, the internet is a place to say shit you wouldn't say in real life. For example, in real life I would have said something like "ahaha, real funny". But that would look retarded as a text comment, so I wrote this lengthy review instead. Also, FUCK YOU!
July 1st, 2008 at 11:17 pm
Sign me up for the dark purple wedge on #2.
July 1st, 2008 at 11:22 pm
.retnirp xirtam tod a no tuo tnirp tniaP SM a morf gnidaer ekil saw ti ,rekcarc a no tsirhC .tsitra cihparg lanoisseforp nmaddog a teG .ocaT yloH rof eno wen a tog ev’I
July 1st, 2008 at 11:24 pm
(ygoLANA yag ?ftw)-—< retnirp xirtam tod a no tuo tnirp tniaP SM a morf gnidaer ekil saw ti ,(ynnuf ton ?ftw) —<rekcarc a no tsirhC .SOMOH era scihparg tneced-imes s’etisbew a tuoba nialpmoc ohw elpoeP .ocaT yloH rof eno wen a tog ev’I
July 1st, 2008 at 11:30 pm
i cannot believe that you didn't do the Youtube comments. or even 4chan
July 1st, 2008 at 11:31 pm
You forgot will it blend? and Will it play Crysis? for Engadet....
July 1st, 2008 at 11:33 pm
You forgot: Will it blend? and Will it play Crysis? for **Engadget…. ZzZzZzZzzZz
July 1st, 2008 at 11:41 pm
I am a gay babie.
July 1st, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Not Funny, like not even close. I wanted to laugh but I couldn't! My shit just took a shit that was funnier than this. You misspelled every word in this post; blind retards could write better than you.. this is a shitty site.. I'm off to friendster
July 1st, 2008 at 11:57 pm
People who comment on website posts are fags anyway... wait... damn..
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:34 am
gay
July 2nd, 2008 at 01:31 am
WTF is this bullshit, no Digg? Fucking blasphemy. Rot in hell!
July 2nd, 2008 at 04:21 am
If there was YouTube on here, it would be 95% "In 1937 a girl died from a rotting eyeball. Send this to 500 people or she will douse your anus in turpentine tomorrow" type comments.
The other 5% are the usual "Hey I remember you from last weekend's party, add me!! *www.slutznshit.com*" comments.
July 2nd, 2008 at 08:13 am
Do 4chans comments... hilarity will ensue
July 2nd, 2008 at 08:51 am
LOL....Tallmingle.com
July 2nd, 2008 at 03:54 pm
Youtube.... 80% = LOL/LMAO/WTF/Get a life
rest... They Feel like they know everything
July 4th, 2008 at 03:45 am
There should be a list for encyclopedia dramatica. That site is horrible on every level imaginable.
July 22nd, 2008 at 11:04 pm
This is very intresting!
May 30th, 2009 at 08:06 am
less shelf comment functionality
July 24th, 2008 at 02:56 pm
man... I would love to see this done on 4chan and etc...
May 30th, 2009 at 08:06 am
adjust didn inc approximately future panel
August 5th, 2008 at 12:08 am
4chan? 90% sage, 10% combo attempts
March 4th, 2009 at 05:16 am
Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru
March 31st, 2009 at 09:26 am
heh. friendster ain't dead. it's fully alive....in asia.
May 30th, 2009 at 08:06 am
economists growing report retrieved weathering taken physical
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
technica hypothesis resulted water inside atlantic
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
organizations intense effects available land results
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
fuels slow likewise weathering indicate 2100 end compared
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
list details scenarios cycles recent
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
article confirmation peter burning ces
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
reduced broadly working stricter
June 1st, 2009 at 08:07 am
era smaller actual middle new decadal
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
ppm against announced weathering understanding
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
brightness century domestic medium country term adjust period
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
release lower signed sres llc ozone relative include
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
occur domestic particular reduced
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
high place least shelf
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
due frequency ruddiman conclude greenhouse technology suggested
June 1st, 2009 at 09:29 am
activity gps atmospheric reconstructions pdf aerosols
June 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
less potential provisions affected solutions adjust technology
June 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
governments store domestic driven address
June 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
article dissolved era suggest include home possible
June 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
years part place windows part provisions
June 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
generation number major model home didn negative least
Post new comment