We're big fans of Digg.com. It's the only site on the Internet that tells us everything we need to know about xkcd comics, Steve Jobs, and Huffington Post posts. But we've actually gotten on their a few times, so I like to monitor our stories that have been submitted to Digg to see how they're doing.
Normally, each story that is submitted to Digg, starts its Digg.com life with one Digg, and moves up from there. One Digg is the absolute minimum Diggs an article could get. Or so I thought. Somehow, our photo of Ron Jeremy dressed up as Super Mario is so crappy that it doesn't even deserve to have one Digg. It actually went backwards. Did someone see this in upcoming and feel the need to bury it? I'm not sure if I should be impressed or insulted. (I'm going to go with impressed.)
PS: If you don't use or know Digg, this post means nothing to you. Please accept this photo of a perfect ass as an apology.
PPS: No, I didn't mean to type the word "Digg" 10 times in this post. But I did anyway.
(3 Comments)
Twitter
Holy Taco Goes to the Bahamas
January 6th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
you can digg up or down so someone digg'd your photo down once no big mystery there. You can find articles with -177 ect ect
January 7th, 2009 at 05:56 pm
gotten on THERE a few times.
moron.
January 8th, 2009 at 04:36 pm
shut the fuck up
Post new comment