April 28th, 2008 | 10:54

When I was sixteen, my brother picked the lock to my bathroom and snapped a picture of me taking a shit fully nude, while reading a Cosmopolitan magazine. A year later that picture was slipped by my brother, in to my aunt’s slideshow presentation of her trip to Greece, that she shared at our family reunion. That was embarrassing. The picture of above that Miley Cyrus took for Vanity Fair, eh, not as embarrassing as she thinks. People.com reports:
“My goal in my music and my acting is always to make people happy. For Vanity Fair, I was so honored and thrilled to work with Annie [Leibovitz]. I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed.”
I love how the people who manage female child stars, Disney included, TOTALLY want to exploit the fact that they’re attractive and that men want to have sex with them, but when anyone ever mentions that something these girls do has a sexual overtone to it, they respond with “We are horrified that this happened. This is not something we condone.” Really? It’s not? Gee, what the F&^K did you think was going to happen when the photographer told Miley “Hey, can you take off your shirt and then wrap this thin sheet over the bottom part of your boobs?”
No, they don’t stop shit like this because they WANT people to want to screw Miley Cyrus because then people will buy and watch shit that Miley Cyrus is in so that they can jerk off to it. If that happens, not only will they have the child demographic who loves her, they’ll also have the jerking off demographic, which, I think we can all agree, spends AT LEAST as much money purchasing things as the child demographic. Anyway, I digress. The photo above is nothing to be embarrassed about. When I first read that she was embarrassed about a picture, I thought I was going to see something like this:

Abu Ghraib Prison, Miley Cyrus




(6)



